Return to the Columbia Daily Spectator
Return to Spec Blogs

The Commentariat: Columbia's new voice of opinion.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

This Shit is Weird, Election Edition

By: The Commentariat at 11:19 pm

[So here's where things stand, election junkies: Obama's up in every swing state that matters, McCain just wasted his October surprise on the Ayers row, and TRN has already elected Obama as president. But just because the race is less interesting doesn't mean it's gotten any less strange. Noah Baron reports. -Ed.]

In 2004, massive internet (and with it, youth) support made Howard Dean seem to be almost undefeatable. This, of course, fell through, but the end of the Dean campaign didn’t spell the end of internet organizing.

For the 2008 primaries, Barack Obama (now the Democratic nominee, for those of you living under a rock), raised a record $32 million—just in January! Of that, $28 million (nearly 88%) came from online donations.

In the Republican race, Ron Paul raised $4 million in individual internet donations on one day, setting yet another record. Yeah, he didn’t win, but, um, that’s a lot of money, especially for the Republican Dennis Kucinich.

As the role of the internet in politics grows greater and greater, so, too, do the number of people and organizations who come up with fun, frightening, creative, or just plain weird ways of supporting their candidate.

Here’s a collection of some of those ridiculous things I’ve found.

1. “I’ve Got a Crush on [Candidate]”

While most people have heard of Obama Girl, some may be surprised (and amused) to hear that she inspired quite a few imitators, including Hillary Boy and, of course the song I’ve Got a Crush on My VP. There used to be something along the lines of I’ve Got a Crush on Huckabee, but it seems that YouTube removed it. Alas.

1. The Chuck Norris Ad

This ad has been widely credited with the success that the Huckabee campaign had. It seems, however, despite Chuck Norris telling America “how it’s gonna be”, we just weren’t ready for a President who wanted to quarantine everyone who is HIV-positive.

1. The Great Schlep

It seems like the Jewish people have yet to jump on the Blame-Nader-for-2000 bandwagon, because this time some of us are doing our utmost to make it up to America. Sarah Silverman, starring in a marginally-funny-yet-possibly-very-offensive-but-to-black-people-not-Jews-so-it’s-totally-not-okay video, threatens to “blame the Jews” if Barack Obama doesn’t win the election (she’s Jewish so it’s totally okay). She urges young American Jews to go visit their grandparents in Florida (a swing state, again) and convince them to vote for Obama. And she invents the word “douchenozzle”.

1. The Barack Obama Youth

So this is, quite frankly, one of the most terrifying things I’ve seen in a while. I’m sure they don’t mean to scare me, but my heart can’t help but to skip a beat when I see people in military uniforms. Marching around. Making funny gestures with their arms. Shouting at me about the policies of a leader. A leader who they really really like. Also, they spelled “Barack” wrong. Oops.

1. The 7-Eleven Election

Apparently (I haven’t been to a 7-Eleven since this past summer) 7-Eleven has decided to be a good corporate citizen and conduct a national poll. You vote for either Barack Obama or John McCain (because there aren’t any other candidates running, duh) by buying a cup of coffee with your preferred candidate’s name on it. Somehow, the corporation keeps track of how many of each candidate’s cups have been bought, and they put the results in a big colorful map on the internet. Nationally, Obama leads by about 6 points (this correlates with actual polling data). In Texas, Obama leads by 8 points (this doesn’t correlate with actual polling data). In conclusion, it’s probably not very accurate, but it’s interesting to see.

1. MyDebates

MySpace partnered up with some other corporation to create MyDebates. The website has a streaming video feed of the presidential debates, surveys, and lots of fun data to look at. The userbase is obviously biased (Barack Obama: 57%; John McCain: 24%), but that’s not my biggest issue with website. Not only does it pretend that Obama and McCain are the only two candidates in the race, but the choices for its survey questions are ridiculous. For example, on the same-sex marriage issue, the choices are:

* “Support the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. Do not take a position on civil unions for same-sex couples.”
* “Repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. Support civil unions for same-sex couples.”
* “Neither”
* “I haven’t decided yet”

I hope I don’t have to explain what’s wrong with this, but I’ll do so anyway. First, it makes it appear as if there are only two legitimate positions to hold on the issue. Second, “Neither” is presented, selecting that option renders one’s opinion entirely invalid, because one could disagree and hold either a position on the far-left or the far-right. Third, the issue of same-sex marriage is complicated, and can’t be boiled down to support or opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act (which, by the way, is unconstitutional twice over – the 14th Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities Clause). Lastly, of course, is the most obvious problem: the policy choices for “same-sex marriage” don’t actually list “same-sex marriage” as an option. Oops. Thanks, MySpace.

Or let’s take the issue of immigration:

* “Secure the country’s borders immediately before considering additional policy reform”
* “We should not act hastily. Border security is only effective if used in conjunction with broader policy reform.”

These options are, of course, meaningless. “broader policy reform” could mean anything from cutting off legal immigration entirely and building a giant wall around the US to getting rid of all barriers to immigration and granting amnesty to everyone. Perhaps these options, of course, are simply reflective of the positions of the candidates (i.e. purposefully vague). Yet anyone who actually goes to Obama’s website and reads the blurb he has about immigration could learn way more way faster. And, of course, God forbid there should be any options besides the ones that are radically centrist.

1. Nailin’ Palin

I heard a rumor about this – supposedly porn being made about Sarah Palin – and then accidentally ran across the website. I closed it in horror (there is a picture of two people having sex with Palin’s, and, yes, McCain’s heads obviously photoshopped on). I can’t find it again. The McCain campaign probably issued a cease-and-desist, and rightly so. Really, you don’t want to see it.

2 Comments »
Tags: fear and loathing, this shit is weird

2 Comments for the post:
This Shit is Weird, Election Edition

  1. Numbered list fail!

    Said Anon,
    On October 8, 2008 at 5:15 pm:

  2. The Great Schlep?
    Sarah Silverman should be the last person anyone, let alone any Jewish person should go to for advice concerning the presidential election. Has anyone seen that abomination of a “comedy program?” I think the Jewish population should see the episode where Sarah portrays herself in a sexual relationship with GOD. Talk about offensive! I hope those who receive visits from their grandchildren sharply slap some sense into those kids if only to stop them from watching that trash and taking advice from and idiot like Silverman. Let them vote for the person they believe in!

    Said Roland,
    On October 8, 2008 at 2:02 pm:

Trackbacking?

Leave Your Comment:

Your e-mail address will never be displayed, however both your name and email are required. By posting, you agree to the Columbia Spectator's comment policy.

Press "Submit Comment" when you are finished and wish to publish your comment.

Subscribe to The Commentariat | SpecBlogs.com

About The Commentariat

Columbia's new voice of opinion!
Blog Editor: Armin Rosen
Associate Blog Editor Vesal Yazdi
Spectator Opinion Editor Miriam Krule

Navigation

  • About the Commentariat
  • Archive

The Authors

  • After Hours (rss)
  • Armin Rosen (rss)
  • Core Blogger (rss)
  • Corydon Shea (rss)
  • Dov Friedman (rss)
  • Eli Katz (rss)
  • Emily Fox (rss)
  • Ginia Sweeney (rss)
  • Joanna Sloame (rss)
  • John Davisson (rss)
  • Josh Schwartz (rss)
  • Josie Aguila (rss)
  • Meghan Mannion (rss)
  • Noah Baron (rss)
  • Raphael Pope-Sussman (rss)
  • Rapunzel (rss)
  • Rebecca Shore (rss)
  • Sarah Cohler (rss)
  • Simone Foxman (rss)
  • The Commentariat (rss)
  • The Core blogger (rss)
  • Vesal Yazdi (rss)

Recent Comments

  • Joachim Martillo: I posted my reply as a Comment to More Campus Conflict over Zionism.
  • Noah Baron: It should also be noted that voters making less than $50,000/year split 50-50 on Amendment 4, which would...
  • Nat G.: Yes, but were the wealthy in California voting on prop 8 as a social issue, or as an economic one? I assume...
  • Noah Baron: Learned, I want to emphasize that what I meant by this was not that everyone, or even that many people,...
  • Noah: Noah, I think your characterization of the pro-NROTC movement is deeply inaccurate. It is simply not true that...
  • Anti-boredom

    • New York Magazine
    • Ohmyrockness
    • The L Magazine
    • Time Out New York
  • Campus hacks

    • Barnard Bulletin
    • Bwog
    • Columbia College Today
    • Columbia Daily Spectator
    • Columbia East Asia Review
    • Columbia Journal of Literary Criticism
    • Columbia Journalism Review
    • Columbia Political Review
    • Columbia Undergraduate Journal of History
    • Columbia Undergraduate Science Journal
    • Columbia University Press
    • El Participante
    • Helvidius
    • Inside New York
    • Off Broadway
    • Saif Ammous
    • Tablet
    • The Birch
    • The Blue and White
    • The Core Junction
    • The Current
    • The Eye
    • The Federalist
    • The Gadfly
    • The Jester
    • The Observer
    • The Phlog
  • Essential reading

    • Chronicle of Higher Education
    • Gothamist
    • NYRB
    • Private Eye
    • The National Journal
    • The New Yorker
    • WikiCU
  • Guilty but not pleasurable

    • IvyGate
  • Guilty pleasures

    • Bored at Columbia
    • Gawker
    • Pitchfork Media
    • Slate
    • World Leaders Forum
  • Marketplace of ideas

    • Amnesty International at Columbia
    • Coalition to Preserve Community
    • College Democrats
    • College Libertarians
    • College Republicans
    • Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability
    • Committee on Global Thought
    • Free Culture
    • I Support Democracy In Iraq
    • International Socialist Organization at Columbia
    • LionPAC
    • The Earth Institute
    • The Philolexian Society
  • Off-campus hacks

    • Al Ahram Weekly
    • BBC News
    • Dartblog
    • Haaretz
    • International Herald Tribune
    • London Review of Books
    • Off Broadway
    • Opinion Journal
    • Politico
    • Real Clear Politics
    • Salon
    • The Drudge Report
    • The Economist
    • The Grey Lady
    • The Monthly Review
    • The Nation
    • The National Review
    • The New Republic
    • WaPo
  • Powers that be

    • Barnard SGA
    • Columbia College Student Council
    • Community Board 9
    • Engineering Student Council
    • GS Lounge
    • The Trustees
  • The least worst alternatives

    • Brooklyn Rail
    • Guernica
    • McSweeney’s
    • n+1
    • The Onion
    • The Paris Review
    • The Village Voice
  • Sidebar Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Return to the Columbia Spectator Online Edition
     

    © Copyright 2008 Spectator Publishing Company, Inc. & Spec Blogs
    Commentariat Blog Home | Spec Blogs Home | Terms of Use | Columbia Daily Spectator